It seems to me that the AFP (American Fascist Party) knuckle draggers forgot who lost at the Alamo Hint: Mexican troops under President General Antonio López de Santa Anna.
Congress has its own library. Congress has a couple representatives, like Massie, with science degrees. The sum total of Massie’s contributions equal his constant rant about private meat production, and a whole lot of non science based noise aimed at sinking the boat. He has no ideas for a life-raft, much less an ark. Most endangering, is his exclusiveness. He wont reply to correspondence, and only appears in safe environments, i.e. with Tucker and other extremist conservatives. Congress does not appear to be fact driven, but rather driven by lobbyists, and organizations that spread their influences with the wealth wand. We have only to turn on a light switch, drive in a car, wake to a warm home, survive a life saving surgery, to know that science keeps gaining with merits of discovery. There is an anti-science element of challenge that is skewing the evidence base, and for what reason? It isn’t Liberty…it isn’t clear.
It seems to me that the AFP (American Fascist Party) knuckle draggers forgot who lost at the Alamo Hint: Mexican troops under President General Antonio López de Santa Anna.
Congress has its own library. Congress has a couple representatives, like Massie, with science degrees. The sum total of Massie’s contributions equal his constant rant about private meat production, and a whole lot of non science based noise aimed at sinking the boat. He has no ideas for a life-raft, much less an ark. Most endangering, is his exclusiveness. He wont reply to correspondence, and only appears in safe environments, i.e. with Tucker and other extremist conservatives. Congress does not appear to be fact driven, but rather driven by lobbyists, and organizations that spread their influences with the wealth wand. We have only to turn on a light switch, drive in a car, wake to a warm home, survive a life saving surgery, to know that science keeps gaining with merits of discovery. There is an anti-science element of challenge that is skewing the evidence base, and for what reason? It isn’t Liberty…it isn’t clear.